Uncategorized

Manual The Loyalists of America and Their Times, Vol. 2 of 2 From 1620-1816

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online The Loyalists of America and Their Times, Vol. 2 of 2 From 1620-1816 file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with The Loyalists of America and Their Times, Vol. 2 of 2 From 1620-1816 book. Happy reading The Loyalists of America and Their Times, Vol. 2 of 2 From 1620-1816 Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF The Loyalists of America and Their Times, Vol. 2 of 2 From 1620-1816 at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF The Loyalists of America and Their Times, Vol. 2 of 2 From 1620-1816 Pocket Guide.

Footnotes, detail, events, important people What I disliked: Well pretty much nothing Who I recommend to: May 27, Sarah rated it it was ok Shelves: I really wanted to read this book, because I wanted a different perspective on history. I don't need entertaining history, but this book was extremely dry and the author kept repeating facts. This guy obviously did his research and includes a lot of primary sources in the book. If you want to get a very different view of American history and don't mind it being dry and a bit repetitive, read this book.

The Loyalists of America and Their Times: from to - Egerton Ryerson - Google Книги

I could not finish this book. Mr Ryerson spent too much time in the first half of the book attempting to debunk other historians' work. The book wasn't so much about the Loyalists as it was about him trying to persuade the reader that his version of history was the correct one. Nick Mat rated it it was amazing Jul 26, Linda rated it liked it Jul 05, Michele rated it really liked it May 30, Francine Crowley rated it it was amazing Oct 16, Ron Stafford rated it really liked it Jun 15, Linda rated it liked it Aug 31, Steve marked it as to-read Jul 28, Kara marked it as to-read Nov 12, Robert marked it as to-read Dec 29, Hooter Hook marked it as to-read Jan 02, Erin marked it as to-read Jan 13, Blanche Barrow added it Aug 28, Wendy added it Oct 17, Alice marked it as to-read Apr 05, John Lawson marked it as to-read Aug 02, Tom Henry marked it as to-read Aug 18, Lora marked it as to-read Nov 13, Joelle marked it as to-read Jan 01, Barb Westgarth marked it as to-read Jan 07, Jennifer Calhoun marked it as to-read May 12, Dunkle is currently reading it Feb 05, Adam Hegedus marked it as to-read Jul 27, The proprietary claims of Messrs.

Trustees under the will of Lord Granville, North Carolina 60, "4. The proprietary claims of Robert Lord Fairfax, proprietor of Virginia 60, "5. Claims of subjects, settled inhabitants of the United States, many of which were cases of great merit and peculiar hardship 32, "6. Claims of persons who appeared to have relief under the Treaty of Peace 14, "7. Claims of creditors on ceded lands in Georgia 45,"] [Footnote The case of such merchants was peculiarly distressing.

In the "Historical Review of the Commission," the Commissioners state: The Treaty of Peace having provided that 'Creditors on either side should meet with no lawful impediment to the recovery of the full value of their debts in sterling money,' losses of this nature have not been considered as within the inquiry directed by the Act, because we cannot consider any right or property as lost to the party where the Government of the country has expressly provided and stipulated for a remedy by a public treaty.

We think it, however, incumbent upon us to represent that the claimants uniformly state to us the insuperable difficulties they find themselves under, as individuals, in seeking the recovery of their debts according to the provision of the treaty, whilst themselves are the objects of prosecution in courts of justice here for debts due to the subjects of the United States. Under such circumstances, the situation of this class of sufferers appears to be singularly distressing—disabled on the one hand by the laws or practice of the several States from recovering the debts due them, yet compellable on the other to pay all demands against them; and though the stipulation in the treaty in their favour has proved of no avail to procure them the redress it holds out in one country, yet they find themselves excluded by it from all claims to relief in the other.

It is certain that but a small proportion of the American Loyalists presented claims before the Parliamentary Commissioners in England for compensation for services or loss of property; and many of those who presented claims did not prosecute them. The Commissioners give the following explanation on this point: The Loyalists, after having been stripped of their rights and property during the war, and driven from their homes, and hunted and killed at pleasure, were exiled from all right of residence and citizenship at the close of the war; and though the Treaty of Peace engaged that Congress should recommend the several States to compensate them for the losses of their property, the Legislatures of the several States with one exception refused any compliance with this stipulation of the national treaty; and the Legislature of New York actually ordered the punishment of those Loyalists who applied for compensation.

At the close of the war, therefore, instead of witnessing, as in the case of all other civilized nations at the termination of a civil war, however rancorous and cruel, a general amnesty and the restoration of all parties to the rights and property which they enjoyed at the commencement of the strife, the Loyalists found themselves exiled and impoverished, and their enemies in possession of their homes and domains. It is true about 3, of the Loyalists were able to employ agents, or appear personally, to apply to the English Government and Parliament for compensation for their losses; and the preceding chapter records the noble appreciation of their character and services by British statesmen, and the liberality of Parliament in making them compensation for their losses and sufferings in maintaining their fidelity to the mother country.

But these 3, constituted not one-tenth of the Loyalists who had suffered losses and hardships during the civil war; upwards of 30, of them were driven from the homes of their birth, and of their forefathers, to wildernesses of everlasting snow.

The Loyalists of America and Their Times, Vol. 2 of 2 From 1620-1816

It was a policy as inhuman and impolitic as that of Spain in expelling upwards of , Moors, the most skilful and profitable of their manufacturers and artizans; or of France, in compelling the escape of above , of the best workers in the finest manufactures to other countries where they laid the foundation of industries which have proved a source of boundless wealth to England at the expense of the commerce and manufactures of France.

The Democrats were then the ruling party in most of the States; the more moderate voice and liberal policy of the Conservative Republicans were hushed and fanned down by the Democratic leaders, who seemed unable to look beyond the gratification of their resentment and avarice; they seemed to fear the residence and presence of men of intelligence, ability, and energy, who might in the future rival if not eclipse them. The maxim of the Loyalists was, obedience to law; heretofore they looked upon the enactments of the States and of Congress as usurpation; those enactments were now recognized as law by England herself, in the acknowledgment of American Independence; and the Loyalists would have been among the most obedient and law-abiding citizens had they been allowed to remain in the land of their nativity and forefathers, and would have largely added to its social advancement, literature, and wealth, and would undoubtedly, before now, have led to the unity of the Anglo-Saxon race under one free and progressive government.

Historians and statesmen have long since condemned this resentful and narrow-minded policy of the States against the Loyalists after the close of the revolutionary war, as do now even American historians. But while this wretched policy depleted the United States of some of their best blood, it laid the foundation of the settlement and institutions of the then almost unknown and wilderness provinces which have since become the wide-spread, free and prosperous Dominion of Canada.

Until very recently, the early history of the Loyalists of America has never been written, except to blacken their character and misrepresent their actions; they were represented as a set of idle office-seekers—an imputation which has been amply refuted by their braving the forests of northern countries, and converting them into fruitful fields, developing trade and commerce, and establishing civil, religious, and educational institutions that are an honour to America itself.

Yet, when exiled from their native land, they were bereft of the materials of their true history. A living American writer truly observes: The most intelligent, the best informed among us, confess the deficiency of their knowledge. The reason is obvious. Men who, like the Loyalists, separate themselves from their friends and kindred, who are driven from their homes, who surrender the hopes and expectations of life, and who become outlaws, wanderers, and exiles—such men leave few memorials behind them. Their papers are scattered and lost, and their very names pass from human recollection.

See a Problem?

To understand the sacrifices which the Loyalists made, and the courage and energy they evinced, in leaving their old homes and associations in the sunny parts of America, and in seeking a refuge and a home in the wilds of the remaining British Provinces, it will be necessary to notice what was then known, and the impression then existing, as to the climate, productions, and conditions of these provinces.

The impressions then entertained as to the climate of Nova Scotia including New Brunswick may be inferred from the following extracts from a pamphlet published in England in Montreal was regarded as the place of transit of the fur trade from the Hudson's Bay Company to England. Upper Canada was then unknown, or known only as a region of dense wilderness and swamps, of venomous reptiles and beasts of prey, the hunting grounds and encampments of numerous Indian tribes, intense cold of winter, and with no other redeeming feature except abundance of game and fish.

Grass, who had been a prisoner during the French war for two or three years at Kingston, then Frontenac, to inquire of him what sort of a country Upper Canada was, and whether people could live there. Grass replied that he thought Upper Canada was a good country, and that people could live there. The British commander expressed much joy at the reply, and asked Mr. Grass if he would undertake to conduct a colony of Loyalists to Canada; the vessels, provisions, etc. Grass asked three days to consider the proposal, and at length consented to undertake the task.


  • Mind Games: Others Thoughts Inside of Me.
  • Success Habits (vol. I)!
  • Download This eBook.

It appears that five vessels were procured and furnished to convey this first colony of banished refugee Loyalists to Upper Canada; they sailed around the coast of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, and up the St. Lawrence to Sorel, where they arrived in October, , and where they built themselves huts or shanties and wintered; and in May, , they prosecuted their voyage in boats, and reached their destination, Cataraqui, afterwards Kingston, in July. The manner of their settlement and providing for their subsistence is described in a succeeding chapter.

Other bands of Loyalists made their way to Canada by land; some by the military highway to Lower Canada, Whitehall, Lake Champlain, Ticonderoga, Plattsburg, and then turning northward proceeded to Cornwall; then ascending the St. Lawrence, along the north side of which many of them settled. But the most common land route from New York to Upper Canada, chosen by the Loyalists at the close of the war, was to Albany miles up the Hudson river, which divides into two branches about ten miles north of Albany. The western branch is called the Mohawk, leading to Rome, formerly Fort Stanwix.

A branch of the Mohawk, called Wood Creek, leads towards the Oneida lake, which was reached by a portage. Flat-bottom boats, specially built or purchased for the purpose by the Loyalists, were used in this journey. The portages over which the boats had to be hauled, and all their contents carried, are stated to be thirty miles.

On reaching Oswego, some of the Loyalists coasted along the eastern shore of Lake Ontario to Kingston, and thence up the Bay of Quinte; others went westward, along the south shore of the lake to Niagara and Queenston; some pursued their course to the head of the lake at Burlington; others made their way up the Niagara river to Queenston, conveyed their boats over the portage of ten or twelve miles to Chippewa, thence up the river and into Lake Erie, settling chiefly in what was called the "Long Point Country," now the county of Norfolk.

This journey of hardship, privation, and exposure occupied from two to three months. The parents and family of the writer of this history were from the middle of May to the middle of July, , in making this journey in an open boat. Generally two or more families would unite in one company, and thus assist each other in carrying their boats and goods over the portages.

A considerable number came to Canada from New Jersey and the neighbourhood of Philadelphia on foot through the then wilderness of New York, carrying their little effects and small children on pack horses, and driving their cattle, which subsisted on herbage of the woods and valleys. Some of the families of this class testified to the relief and kindness they received in their extreme exigencies from the Indians. The hardships, exposures, privations and sufferings which the first Loyalists endured in making their way from their confiscated homes to Canada, were longer and more severe than anything narrated of the Pilgrim and Puritan Fathers of New England in their voyages from England to Massachusetts Bay; and the persecutions to which the emigration of the Puritans from England is attributed were trifling indeed in comparison of the persecutions, imprisonments, confiscations, and often death, inflicted on the loyal adherents to the Crown of England in the United States, and which drove the survivors among them to the wilderness of Canada.

The privations and hardships experienced by many of these Loyalist patriots for years after the first settlement in Canada, as testified by the papers in the subsequent chapter, were much more severe than anything experienced by the Pilgrim Fathers during the first years of their settlement in Massachusetts.

These latter could keep a "Harvest Home" festival of a week, at the end of the first year after their landing in the Bay of Massachusetts; but it was years after their arrival in Canada before the Loyalists could command means to keep any such festival. The stern adherence of the Puritans to their principles was quite equalled by the stern adherence of the Loyalists to their principles, and far excelled by their sacrifices and sufferings. Canada has a noble parentage, the remembrance of which its inhabitants may well cherish with respect, affection, and pride.

Nor is this all: Thus in the divisions of families which everywhere occurred, and which formed one of the most distressing circumstances of the conflict, there were wives and daughters, who, although bound to Loyalists by the holiest ties, had given their sympathies to the right from the beginning, and who now, in the triumph of the cause which had their prayers, went meekly—as woman ever meets a sorrowful lot—into hopeless, interminable exile.

The Loyalists who were attached to military corps raised in the extreme South were principally of the Southern States, and a large portion of them settled in the Bahamas, Florida, and the British West Indies. Those excellent men, who, preferring to sacrifice life and fortune rather than forego the enviable distinction of being British subjects, saw that this vast field afforded a sure and certain mode of safety and of honourable retreat, and accordingly, in , ten thousand 10, were enumerated in that portion of Canada, who, under the proud title of United Empire Loyalists, had turned their backs for ever upon the new-fangled republicanism and treason of the country of their birth.

They ultimately were, however, blessed with success; and to this day the original letters U. It is not possible to give biographical sketches of all the old Loyalists, officers and soldiers. To do justice to their character and merits would require a massive volume. Besides, the data for such a volume are for the most part wanting. It is not the object of this history to give a biography of the Loyalists; that must be done by others, if attempted at all. The Loyalists were not writers, but workers. Almost the only history of them has been written by their enemies, whose object was to conceal the treatment they received, to depreciate their merits and defame their character, for the vindication of which it is only of late years that materials have been procured.

It is the object of this history to vindicate their character as a body, to exhibit their principles and patriotism, and to illustrate their treatment and sufferings. The best, and indeed only biography of the Loyalists extant is Sabine's " American Loyalists, or Biographical Sketches of Adherents to the British Crown in the War of the Revolution ,"—especially the first, not the second edition.

The author has more than once quoted the excellent historical essay introductory to the sketches of this work, and from which Dr. Canniff has enriched the pages of his valuable " History of the Settlement of Upper Canada, with special reference to the Bay of Quinte. These notices will further illustrate the character and sacrifices of the Loyalist combatants—the treatment they received and the courage they displayed.

Account Options

He continued to reside on his property near Cornwall until his decease in , at the age of one hundred and one. His property in New York was abandoned and lost. John Bethune father of the late Bishop of Toronto , of North Carolina, was chaplain to the Loyal Militia; was taken prisoner at the battle of Cross Creek; was confined in jail, first at Halifax and finally in Philadelphia.

After his release, his continued loyalty reduced him to great distress. He was appointed to the 84th Regiment and restored to comfort. At the peace, he settled in Upper Canada, at Williamston, near Cornwall, and died in , at the age of sixty-five. Doane , of Bucks County, Pennsylvania. They were men of fine figure and address, elegant horsemen, great runners and leapers, and excellent at stratagems and escapes. Their father was respectable, and possessed a good estate. The sons themselves, prior to the war, were men of reputation and proposed to remain neutral; but harassed personally, their property sold by the Whigs, because they would not submit to the exactions of the time, they determined to avenge themselves by a predatory warfare upon their persecutors, and to live in the open air as best they could.

They became the terror of the surrounding country; they spared the weak, the poor, and the peaceful; they aimed at public property and at public men. Generally their expeditions were on horseback. Sometimes the five went together; at other times separately, with accomplices. Whoever of them was apprehended, broke jail; whoever of them was assailed, escaped. In a word, such was their course, that a reward of L was offered for the head of each.

Ultimately, three were slain; Moses, after a desperate fight, was shot by his captor; and Abraham and Mahlon were living at Philadelphia. Joseph, before the revolution, taught school. During the war, while on a marauding expedition, he was shot through the cheeks, and was taken prisoner. He was committed to await his trial, but escaped to New Jersey. He resumed his former employment in New Jersey and lived there under an assumed name for nearly a year, but finally fled to Canada.

The only mention of Israel is that "in February, , he appealed to the Council of Pennsylvania to be released on account of his own sufferings and the destitute condition of his family, and that his petition was dismissed. Stephen Jarvis , in was a lieutenant of cavalry in the South Carolina Royalists; was in several battles; was in New Brunswick; after the revolution came to Upper Canada, and died at Toronto in , aged eighty-four. William Jarvis was an officer of cavalry in the Queen's Rangers; was wounded at the siege of Yorktown. David Jones was captain in the royal service, and the reputed spouse or husband of the "beautiful and good Jane McCrea," whose cruel death in , by the Indians, on her way to join him, is so universally known and lamented.

He lived in Canada to an old age, but never married. Jane McCrea was the daughter of the Rev. James McCrea, a Loyalist. Later in the war he was captain under General Frazer. He was descended from an old colonial family, and served during the revolution as a captain in the New Jersey volunteers. On the outbreak of the revolution he warmly espoused the side of the Crown, and was early in the war captured and confined in Burlington jail, from which he escaped in the year , and made his way to the British army at Staten Island.

During the remainder of the war he served with his regiment. His connection with the execution of Captain Joshua Huddy, of the rebel service, attracted a great deal of attention both in Europe and America.

Tories: Fighting for the King in America's First Civil War

Captain Huddy was a partisan officer of some repute in New Jersey, and had been concerned in the murder of a Loyalist named Philip White, who was a relative of Lippincott, and a resident of Shrewsbury. One Edwards of the same neighbourhood had also been put to death about the same time. Shortly after, Captain Huddy was captured and taken as prisoner to New York. He was authorized to execute Huddy in retaliation for White, who had already been put to death.

Therefore, on the 12th of April, , having exchanged the two other prisoners, Captain Lippincott hung Huddy on a tree by the beach, under the Middleton Heights. In the tree was still to be seen, and tradition keeps alive in the neighbourhood the story connected with it. Captain Lippincott, who was evidently only obeying orders, pinned a paper on Huddy's breast with the following inscription: This demand was refused, and Washington then ordered the execution of one officer of equal rank to be chosen by lot from among the prisoners in his hands. The lot fell upon Captain Asgill, of the Guards, who was only nineteen years of age.

The British authorities secured a respite under promise of trying Captain Lippincott by court-martial. After a full inquiry, Lippincott was honourably acquitted. In the meantime, Lady Asgill, Captain Asgill's mother, appealed to the Count de Vergennes, the French Minister, and, in response to her most pathetic appeal, the Count was instructed by the King and Queen of France, in their joint names, to ask of Washington the release of Captain Asgill "as a tribute to humanity.

Asgill lived to become a general, and to succeed to his father's baronetcy. After the war Captain Lippincott moved to New Brunswick, to a place called Pennfield, where he lived till the fall of , when he went to England, where he remained till the end of He was granted half pay as a captain of the British army, and in he moved from New Brunswick to Canada, when he was granted for his U.

Loyalist services 3, acres of land in the township of Vaughan, near Toronto. He lived near Richmond Hill for many years. His only surviving child, Esther Borden Lippincott, was married in to the late Colonel George Taylor Denison, of Bellevue, Toronto, at whose house Captain Lippincott died in , aged eighty-one years. The family of Denisons of Toronto are all descendants of Captain Lippincott through this marriage. Alexander McDonald was a major in a North Carolina regiment, and was the husband of the celebrated Flora McDonald, who was so true and devoted to Prince Charles Edward, the last of the Stuarts who sought the throne of England.

They had emigrated to North Carolina; and when the revolution broke out, he, with two sons, took up arms for the Crown. John McGill was, in , an officer of infantry in the Queen's Rangers, and at the close of the war went to New Brunswick; removed thence to Upper Canada, became a man of note and member of the Legislative Council, and died at Toronto, in , at the age of eighty-three. Embracing the royal side in the contest, he formed one of a "determined band of young men," who attacked a Whig post, and, in the face of a superior force, cut down the flag-staff and tore in strips the stars and stripes attached to it.

Subsequently he joined a grenadier company called the Royal Yorkers, and performed efficient service throughout the war. At the peace he settled in Canada; and entering the British service again in , was appointed captain in the colonial corps by Sir Isaac Brock. He died at River Raisin, Canada, in , aged eighty years. Thomas Merrit , of New York father of the late Hon.


  • Things I Wish Id Known Sooner: Personal Discoveries of a Mother of Twelve;
  • Die letzte Fahrt (Die haarsträubenden Fälle des Philip Maloney 8) (German Edition).
  • The Loyalists of America and Their Times, Vol. 2 of 2 by Egerton Ryerson;

Hamilton Merrit , was in cornet of cavalry in the Queen's Rangers. He settled in Upper Canada, and held the office of high sheriff of the Niagara district. He died at St. Catharines, May, , at the age of eighty years. The Robinson family was one of the distinguished families in America before, during, and after the revolution, and its members have filled some of the most important offices in the provinces of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Lower and Upper Canada. He removed to New York, and married Susanna, daughter of Frederick Phillipse, Esquire, who owned an immense landed estate on the Hudson river.

By this connection Mr. Robinson added greatly to his wealth and became very rich. When the revolutionary controversy commenced, he was living on that portion of the Phillipse estate which had been given to his wife, and there he desired to remain in the quiet enjoyment of country life, and in the enjoyment of his large domains. That such was his inclination is asserted by the late President Dwight, and is fully continued by circumstances and by his descendants.

He was opposed to the measures of the British Ministry, gave up the use of imported merchandize, and clothed himself and family in fabrics of domestic manufacture. But he was opposed to the separation of the colonies from the mother country. Still he wished to take no part in the conflict of arms.

The importunity of friends overruled his own judgment, and he entered the military service of the Crown. Of the Loyal American Regiment, raised principally in New York by himself, he was commissioned the colonel. He also commanded the corps called Guides and Pioneers. Of the former, or the Loyal Americans, his son Beverley was lieutenant-colonel, and Thomas Barclay, major. He and Washington had been personal friends until political events produced separation between them. At the peace, Colonel Robinson, with a part of his family, went to England. His name appears as a member of the first Council of New Brunswick; but he never took his seat at the Board.

His wife, with himself, was attainted for high treason; in order to secure her property to the Americans, she was included in the Confiscation Act of New York, and the whole of the estate derived from her father passed from the family.

Similar Books

Colonel Robinson has highly respectable descendants in New Brunswick as well as in Canada. The Robinsons were unquestionably immediate sufferers from the events which drove them into exile. But though Colonel Robinson was not amply compensated in money by the Government for which he sacrificed fortune, home, and his native land, yet the distinction obtained by his children and grand-children in the colonies, though deprived of their inheritance, has not been without other and substantial recompense, as no persons of the Loyalist descent have been more favoured in official stations and powerful family alliances than the heirs of the daughters of Frederick Phillipse, Susanna Robinson, and Mary Morris see under the names of Colonel Roger Morris and Colonel Thomas Barclay.

At the evacuation of New York, Lieutenant-Colonel Robinson was placed at the head of a large number of Loyalists who embarked for Shelburne, Nova Scotia, and who laid out that place in a very handsome manner, in the hope of its becoming a town of business and importance. The harbour of Shelburne is represented to be one of the best in North America; the population rapidly increased to about 12, persons, but soon as rapidly declined, being outrivalled by Halifax—and many abandoned Shelburne for other parts of the British provinces.

His deprivations and sufferings for a considerable time after leaving New York were great, but were finally relieved by the receipt of half-pay as an officer in the service of the Crown. In New Brunswick he was a member of his Majesty's Council; and at the period of the French revolution, and on the occurrence of the Napoleonic war between England and France, he was entrusted with the command of the regiment raised in that colony, possessed great energy, and contributed much by his exertions and influence to settle and advance the commercial emporium of New Brunswick.

In the Confiscation Act of New York, by which his estate was taken from him, he was styled "Beverley Robinson the younger. At the peace he went first to New Brunswick, and then to Nova Scotia, receiving a grant of land in each province. His salary, half pay, and an estate of 2, acres, placed him in comfortable circumstances. Sir John Beverley Robinson was a son of Christopher Robinson, of Virginia; received his early legal education in England, and was admitted to the English bar.