Beginning with the foundation of love is what differentiates the Christian faith from others Oord defines love as: Is this not what has defined Christians throughout history? Read more Read less. Kindle Cloud Reader Read instantly in your browser. Customers who viewed this item also viewed.
Argument from love - Wikipedia
Page 1 of 1 Start over Page 1 of 1. The Uncontrolling Love of God: An Open and Relational Account of Providence. A Biblical and Systematic Theology. God in an Open Universe: Science, Metaphysics, and Open Theism. Product details File Size: Chalice Press April 10, Publication Date: April 10, Sold by: Related Video Shorts 0 Upload your video. Share your thoughts with other customers. Write a customer review. Read reviews that mention god oord essential kenosis nygren agape jay view critique theologies augustine thomas ideas chapters act well-being loving evil creation pinnock. There was a problem filtering reviews right now.
Please try again later.
Thomas Jay Oord has written a theological gem with this one. Having read about this book on his blog, I picked it up and read it within a few days of receiving it in the mail. First of all, the writing is accessible and clear, and Oord never wanders far from his main thesis that a robust theology of love must be at the center of the Christian faith. In fact, Oord could easily have written a longer book on this topic, but instead packed his ideas into a concise pages. What emerges is, first of all, a holistic definition of love see the product description.
Book Review – The Nature of Love: A Theology by Thomas Jay Oord
After making a convincing case to return love to the center of Christian theology on biblical and philosophical grounds, Oord defines love around "agape", "eros", and "philia" and offers an excellent critique of Augustinian love theology. Calling it "essential kenosis" a kind of panentheism , it occupies a middle ground between Clark Pinnock's version of Open Theism and Process Theology. He maintains that essential kenosis is not only more philosophically satisfying for questions of love and theodicy than usual forms of process theology, but also more biblical than Pinnock's Open Theism.
Oord argues that even dead bodies retain a measure of agency and responsiveness to stimuli, and that it is thus conceivable to maintain that God never coerces, while also believing in a bodily resurrection of Jesus.
He argues in similar ways for actual miracles and eschatology. His view of eschatology will certainly spark debate, as he asserts that belief in a non-coercive God requires us to hold to a participatory eschatology. This is a logical step in his theology of essential kenosis, because if God never coerces but always requires creaturely participation, a guaranteed final victory at the end is out of the question.
In other words, Oord believes that the end does not justify the means. We cannot be absolutely certain of a final glorious outcome, but instead must put our hope in "the steadfast, kenotic, and noncoercive love of God. Once we seek more knowledge about God.
Argument from love
Kindle Edition Verified Purchase. This book is essential in understanding modern theology of God. Once we seek more knowledge about God, we discover that God is nothing but love. God gave his Son for our sis and to provide us a way towards salvation. This book explains that journey that all of us must follow in order to find a loving relationship with God.
You want to understand God. One person found this helpful 2 people found this helpful.
- The Nature of Love: A Theology - Thomas Jay Oord - Google Books.
- The Nature of Love: A Theology - Thomas Jay Oord - Google Книги;
- A Vengeful Spirit (Shelly Gale Mystery).
Oord hits the nail on the head again! One person found this helpful. This guy is one of the few Christians who I've ever heard of that believes in addressing love appropriately, so he's one of my top five favorite Christians on the planet. To do a very nit-picky critique in order to present a fair and critical review, I will say that he's a little tiny bit superficial with Outka's rendering of Nygren. Again, the guy tossed Nygren's central thesis. That's not very supportive. I think Outka's statements in support of Nygren are really just a front so that he doesn't tick off an overly-sensitive readership not that the malarkey of Outka's work isn't bloody terrible to deal with anyway, muting that attempt.
Ultimately this is an irrelevant note because Outka actually is very similar to Nygren on ascent-oriented agape so whether Oord fell for the front rather than Outka's actual position on Nygren is essentially inconsequential that's a helluva statement which I'd rather formally explore and nuance and back-off a bit from but I'm feeling lazy here. Other than that very inconsequential critique however, wonderful text, buy it, share it, no substantial complaints and on the whole, I'm really with Oord's position against Nygren and Outka, we must do better than monoenergetic Love, not that I have an alternative and not that an ascent-oriented love isn't it's own disaster of a selfish hunt like a selfish learned-helplessness as love.
Oord might be the most important Christian leader there is and he has a long way to go. I think he's got the right idea even if I don't particularly like his execution of evaluating love in each of his books. Elder Porphyrios is another who was writing on Love with some gusto like this Oord fella, but other than that, I really wouldn't recommend some of the standards like bits on I Corinthians 13 by Ligouri or Golden Mouth one has great quotes but portrays Jesus as merciless and the other is too simple. Presentation of position is cumbersome and difficult to follow.
Author did a nice job of introducing the concepts forming a foundation for open theology and Essential Kenosis. If we are going to consider love as an argument for God's existence, then it seems we can say hate is an argument for God's non-existence. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Part of a series on the Philosophy of religion Religious concepts. Ethical egoism Euthyphro dilemma Logical positivism Religious language Verificationism eschatological Problem of evil Theodicy Augustinian Irenaean Best of all possible worlds Inconsistent triad Natural evil.
Criticism of religion Ethics in religion Exegesis Faith and rationality History of religions Political science of religion Religion and science Religious philosophy Theology. Michael Welker in The Work of Love p "in this love God's identity and power are made known " italics in original. Eschatological verification Language game Logical positivism Apophatic theology Verificationism. Augustinian theodicy Best of all possible worlds Euthyphro dilemma Inconsistent triad Irenaean theodicy Natural evil Theodicy.
Criticism of religion Ethics in religion Exegesis History of religion Religion Religious language Religious philosophy Relationship between religion and science Political science of religion Faith and rationality more Christianity Hinduism Islam Jainism Judaism. Abrahamic prophecy Aggadah Denominations Kabbalah Philosophy.
Challenges Ethical egoism Euthyphro dilemma Logical positivism Religious language Verificationism eschatological.