It was this that caused such concern - a taboo subject which, at all costs, had to be separated from the necessary image of Jesus. We have all learned to go along with what we are taught about the Gospels in schoolrooms and churches. But is the teaching correctly related? Does it always conform with the written scriptures?
bloodline of the holy grail
It is actually quite surprising how much we learn from pulpits or picture-books without checking the biblical text. The Nativity story itself provides a good example. It is widely accepted that Jesus was born in a stable - but the Gospels do not say that. In fact, there is no 'stable' mentioned in any authorised Gospel. The Nativity is not mentioned at all in Mark or John, and Matthew makes it quite plain that Jesus was born in a house.
So where did the 'stable' idea come from? It came from a misinterpretation of the Gospel of Luke, which relates that Jesus was 'laid in a manger' - and a manger was nothing more than an animal feeding-box.
Frequently bought together
In practice, it was perfectly common for mangers to be used as emergency cradles and they were often brought indoors for that very purpose. Why, then, has it been presumed that this particular manger was in a stable? Because the English translations of Luke tell us that there was 'no room in the inn'. But the old manuscript of Luke did not say that. In fact, there were no inns in the region. The original Greek text of Luke does not relate that there was 'no room in the inn'. By the best translation it actually states that there was 'no place in the room' that is: As previously mentioned, Matthew states that Jesus was born in a house and, when correctly translated, Luke reveals that Jesus was laid in a manger a feeding-box because there was no cradle provided in the room.
To facilitate the best possible trust in the Gospels, we must go back to the original Greek manuscripts with their often used Hebrew and Aramaic words and phrases. In this respect, we discover that a good deal of relevant content has been misrepresented, misunderstood, mistranslated, or simply just lost in the telling. Sometimes this has happened because original words have no direct counterpart in other languages.
Christians are taught that Jesus' father Joseph was a carpenter, as explained in the English-language Gospels. But it did not say that in the original Gospels. By the best translation, it actually said that Joseph was a "master craftsman" rendered in Greek as 'ho tekton' from the Semitic term 'naggar'. The word 'carpenter' was simply a translator's concept of a craftsman - but the text actually denoted that Joseph was a masterly, learned and scholarly man. Another example is the concept of the Virgin Birth. English-language Gospels tell us that Jesus' mother Mary was a 'virgin'.
It was the same in an early Latin text which referred to her as being a 'virgo', meaning nothing more than a young woman. To have meant the same thing as virgin does today, the Latin would have been 'virgo intacta' - that is to say, a young woman intact. Looking back beyond the Latin to the older documents, we discover that the word translated to 'virgo' a young woman was the Semitic word 'almah' which meant the very same - a young woman.
It had no sexual connotation whatever. Had Mary actually been physically virgo intacta, the Semitic word used would have been 'bethulah', not 'almah'. Apart from such anomalies, the canonical Gospels suffer from numerous purposeful amendments. He deleted a substantial section from the Gospel of Mark and justified his action in a letter, stating: Even at that stage, there was already a discrepancy between what the Gospel writers had written and what the early bishops wanted to teach!
But what exactly was in this removed section of Mark? It was the item which dealt with the raising of Lazarus - in the course of which the account made it perfectly clear that Jesus and Mary Magdalene were man and wife. Many scholars have suggested that the wedding at Cana was the marriage of Jesus and Mary Magdalene - but this was not the wedding ceremony as such, being simply the pre-marital betrothal feast.
The marriage is defined by the quite separate anointings of Jesus by Mary at Bethany. Chronologically, these anointings as given in the Gospels were two-and-a-half years apart.
Bloodline of the Holy Grail: The Hidden Lineage of Jesus Revealed by Laurence Gardner
Readers of the 1st century would have been fully conversant with the two-part ritual of the sacred marriage of a dynastic heir. Jesus, as we know, was a Messiah, which means quite simply an Anointed One. In fact, all anointed senior priests and Davidic kings were Messiahs; Jesus was not unique in this regard. Although not an ordained priest, he gained his right to Messiah status by way of descent from King David and the kingly line, but he did not achieve that status until he was ritually anointed by Mary Magdalene in her capacity as a bridal high priestess.
In the Old Testament's Song of Solomon we learn of the bridal anointing of the king. It is detailed that the oil used in Judah was the fragrant ointment of spikenard an expensive root oil from the Himalayas , and it is explained that this ritual was performed while the kingly husband sat at the table.
In the New Testament, the anointing of Jesus by Mary Magdalene was indeed performed while he sat at the table, and specifically with the bridal ointment of spikenard. Afterwards, Mary wiped Jesus' feet with her hair and, on the first occasion of the two-part ceremony, she wept. All of these things signify the marital anointing of a dynastic heir.
Messianic marriages were always conducted in two stages. The first the anointing in Luke was the legal commitment to wedlock, while the second the later anointing in Matthew, Mark and John was the cementing of the contract. In Jesus and Mary's case the second anointing was of particular significance for, as explained by Flavius Josephus in the 1st-century Antiquities of the Jews, the second part of the marriage ceremony was never conducted until the wife was three months pregnant.
Dynastic heirs such as Jesus were expressly required to perpetuate their lines. Marriage was essential, but community law protected the dynasts against marriage to women who proved barren or kept miscarrying. This protection was provided by the three-month pregnancy rule. Miscarriages would not often happen after that term, subsequent to which it was considered safe enough to complete the marriage contract. After the second Bethany anointing, the Gospels relate that Jesus said: But did the Church authorities honour Mary Magdalene and speak of this act as a memorial?
No they did not; they completely ignored Jesus' own directive and denounced Mary as a whore.
To the Nazarenes, however, Mary Magdalene was always regarded as a saint. She is still revered as such by many today, with numerous churches dedicated to her in the Renaissance era. But the interesting fact of this sainthood is that Mary is the recognized patron saint of wine-growers - the ultimate Grail guardian of the Vine. Aspects of the Gospels can actually be followed outside the Bible.
Even the crucifixion sentence of Jesus is mentioned in the Annals of Imperial Rome. We can now determine from chronological survey that the Crucifixion took place at the March Passover of AD 33, while the Bethany second marriage anointing was in the week prior to that. We also know that, at that stage, Mary Magdalene was three months pregnant - which means she should have given birth in September of AD As for Jesus' death on the cross, it is perfectly clear this was spiritual death, not physical death, as determined by a three-day excommunication rule that everybody in the 1st century would have understood.
In civil and legal terms, Jesus was denounced, scourged and prepared for death by decree. For three days Jesus would have been nominally 'sick', with absolute 'death' coming on the fourth day. Prior to this he would be entombed buried alive in accordance with Jewish Council law - but during the first three days he could be raised or resurrected, as he had predicted would be the case. Raisings and resurrections could only be performed by the High Priest or by the Father of the Community.
The High Priest at that time was Joseph Caiaphas the very man who condemned Jesus , therefore the raising had to be performed by the patriarchal Father. There are Gospel accounts of Jesus talking to the Father from the cross, culminating in "Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit" - and the appointed Father of the day was the Magian apostle Simon Zelotes. During that Friday afternoon when Jesus was on the Cross, there was a forward time change, and the Gospels explain that the land fell into darkness for three hours. The Hebrew lunarists made their change during the daytime, but the Nazarene solarists did not make their change until midnight.
This explains why, according to the Gospel of Mark which relates to lunar time , Jesus was crucified at the third hour, but in John which uses solar time he was crucified at the sixth hour. On that evening the Hebrews began their Sabbath at the old nine o'clock, but the Essenes and Magians still had three hours to go before their Sabbath. During those extra three hours they were able to work with Jesus while others were not allowed to undertake any physical activity.
It was for this reason that the women were so astonished when they found the tomb-stone moved at daybreak on the Sunday - not because it was moved, but because it had been moved on the Sabbath. And so we come to one of the most misunderstood events in the Bible - the Ascension. And in consideration of this, the births of Jesus and Mary Magdalene's children become apparent. We know from Gospel chronology that the Bethany second-marriage anointing of Jesus by Mary Magdalene was in the week before the Crucifixion at the time of the March Passover.
Also that, at that stage, Mary was three-months pregnant and should, therefore, have given birth six months later in the notional month of September AD The story is taken up in the Acts of the Apostles, which detail for that month the event which we have come to know as the Ascension.
One thing which the Acts do not do, however, is to call the event the Ascension. This was a tag established by way of a Church doctrine more than three centuries later. What the Bible text actually says is: It then continues, relating that a man in white said to the disciples: Then, a little later in the Acts, it says that heaven must receive Jesus until 'the times of restitution'.
Given that this was the very month in which Mary Magdalene's child was due, is there perhaps some connection between Mary's confinement and the so-called Ascension? There certainly is, and the connection is made by virtue of the said 'times of restitution'. Not only were there rules to govern the marriage ceremony of a Messianic heir, but so too were there rules to govern the marriage itself.
The rules of dynastic wedlock were quite unlike the Jewish family norm, and Messianic parents were formally separated at the birth of a child. Even prior to this, intimacy between a dynastic husband and wife was only allowed in December, so that births of heirs would always fall in the month equivalent to September - the month of Atonement, the holiest month of the calendar.
From the moment of a dynastic birth, the parents were physically separated - for six years if the child was a boy and for three years if the child was a girl. Their marriage would only be recommenced at designated 'times of restitution'. Meanwhile, the mother and child would enter the equivalent of a convent and the father would enter the kingdom of heaven. This kingdom was the Essene high monastery at Mird, by the Dead Sea, and the ceremony of entry was conducted by the angelic priests under the supervision of the appointed leader of the pilgrims.
In the Old Testament book of Exodus, the Israelite pilgrims were led into the Holy Land by a cloud and, in accordance with this continued Exodus imagery, the priestly leader of the pilgrims was designated with the title Cloud. So, if we read the Acts verses as they were intended to be understood, we see that Jesus was taken up by the Cloud the leader of the pilgrims to the kingdom of heaven the high monastery , whereupon the man in white an angelic priest said that Jesus would return at the times of restitution when his earthly marriage was restored.
Genesis of the Grail Kings: Genesis of the Grail Kings. Lost Secrets of the Sacred Ark: The Lost Secret of the Freemasons Revealed. Realm of the Ring Lords: The Myth and Magic of the Grail Quest. Sponsored products related to this item What's this? Chronicles of the Nephilim Box Set: The Greatest Cover-up in History. The real story of the Holy Grail, the last week of Jesus Christ and the truth based system. Glastonbury and the Grail: The Mystery of Julia Episcopa: The chance discovery of an ancient parchment reveals a secret that men will kill to protect.
Curiosity Killed The Cat: About the Author Laurence Gardner, a Fellow of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, is a constitutional historian, international lecturer and broadcaster. Related Video Shorts 0 Upload your video.
A Catholic Quest for the Holy Grail. The Gnostic Notebook Omnibus: Volumes One, Two, and Three. This is the book your future self will travel back in time to stop you from reading. Share your thoughts with other customers. Write a customer review. Read reviews that mention gardner truth bible claims mary historical christian church blood laurence research fascinating christianity magdalene christ evidence theories god facts catholic.
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later. Kindle Edition Verified Purchase. I can't say enough about the depth and breadth of this work! Not only did I find new answers, but I discovered new questions. That to me indicates the value of a work such as this, when the reader is so inspired by the contents, they seek to answer new and formerly unknown questions they could not have begun to ponder without first discovering so much detail in a work like this!
Laurence Gardner is now my new favorite author!
Bloodline of the Holy Grail: The Hidden Lineage of Jesus Revealed
So very much authoritative detail that makes you go "Aha! Now I see the historical connections clearly! That makes the reading so much more enjoyable in my opinion, as stumbling blocks are not encountered anywhere that otherwise force the reader to interrupt the flow of their reading to resolve any typographical error. Do I recommend this book?
This book is very detailed about the possible lineage of Jesus and Maryit was not what I was looking for exactly but I learned numerous details that were unknown to me like he traveled to Tibet and studied at one of the Mystery schools there. Also, the relationship between Jesus and Mary and their heirs. According to Gardner he had children after his days at Jerusalem he did not die on the cross as stated in the conical Bible states and has led numerous people to believe this myth.
According to Lawrence Gardner he also traveled to England where he established some other teaching schools with Mary and his Jewish uncle who had business interest in England.
- The Natural World of Ivy Lane.
- The Illustrated Bloodline of the Holy Grail: Hidden Lineage of Jesus Revealed by Laurence Gardner!
- Road To Involution (Change Your Mind - Change Your Life Book 1).
- See a Problem?.
- The Billionaires 50 Jewels Parts 1, 2 & 3 (Dominating Billionaire Erotic Romance)!
- Bloodline of the Holy Grail: The Hidden Lineage of Jesus Revealed - Laurence Gardner - Google Книги;
- I Cant Remember If Im the Good Sister or the Evil One!
Fascinating book that really makes one reevaluate their faith in Christianity since at the Council of Nicaea AD many books of the bible where omitted. The answer lies within the book. Its sad that Mr. Gardner's is no longer with us but his numerous scholarly books are here for us to study and accept or reject his assertions and ponder!
Anybody who is a true theology enthaustic will be enlightened when this book is read and perhaps spur one to other ancient research for better or worse! This first ecumenical council was the first effort to attain consensus in the church through an assembly representing all of Christendom. Its main accomplishments were settlement of the Christological issue of the nature of the Son of God and his relationship to God the Father, the construction of the first part of the Creed of Nicaea, establishing uniform observance of the date of Easter, and promulgation of early canon law.
Gardner's books are simply great. He brings forth information you're not going to hear in catechism class which was once considered the base truth of Christian Belief. His presentation of so many facts, documents, lineages and records expunged from the commonplace aids a person's quest through the maze of commonly accepted history and beyond the haze of the religious mindsets imposed on us since childhood. Each of his books, while connected in theme, propel the reader on this journey, packed with enough information for us to draw our own conclusions.
It depends on whether one is a thinker or a believer. The believers' minds will be made up, and they don't want to be confused by facts, most of which have been available to the informed for decades, nay millennia, and which correlate quite well with other source works. The background in ancient Jewish law regarding royal and priestly dynasties make this book a very interesting read and tend to confirm the suppositions of the authors,.
The theory is continued in "Holy Blood, Holy Grail," by Michael Baigent, et al, which I found to be an interesting "sequel," covering a longer time span and a broader field of topics, including the Templars and the Merovignian Dynasty. Very informative - I was impressed by the research, bibliography and credentials of the author.
Easy to read- fascinating information. I'm "in to" all things grail and the secret societies of the middle ages. This genealogy makes much more sense than the 16 years of roman catholic doctrine and theology included in my Dominican, Franciscan, and Benedictine education between and Enjoyed this book quite a bit.
One person found this helpful 2 people found this helpful. This book is one to open your eyes. Gives you the knowledge to understand the New Testament and what Jesus was all about It does give info that a dogmatic Christian would be horrified to learn if they believed any of it. But, for one who has been sincerely searching for truth and realizes that what is taught in most churches today is wrong and is something cooked up by men and dogmatically taught to its members, and If you are confused about your own beliefs and sincerely want to know the truth read this boo k.
I added this to my genealogy collection. I have not read it yet. However, my dad came for the weekend and read it and found it very interesting.