I am Jewish, can I become a Christian? Why did blood and water come out of Jesus' side when He was pierced? What is the Via Dolorosa? What are the Stations of the Cross and what can we learn from them? Who was Simon of Cyrene? What were the seven last words of Jesus Christ on the cross and what do they mean?
Is Jesus the Messiah? What are the strongest biblical arguments for the divinity of Christ? Is Jesus God's Son? How could Allah, being one, have a Son? Who was Barabbas in the Bible? What is the account of Annas and Caiaphas? Who was Caiaphas in the Bible? The Comedy at Calvary Luke Consummation at Calvary Luke Recommended reading for background. Darrell Bock frequently quotes from this work. The Trial of Jesus Luke Religious Curiosity Bishop Win.
Bourdaloue -- the Passion of Christ. The Character of Pilate. Jesus Vindicated by His Enemies.
The Majesty of Meekness, Etc. Imitating the Silence of Christ. Our Lord Before Herod. The Silence of Jesus. Jesus Delivered to Their Will. The Act of a Moment and its Results. Compulsion and Invitation; the Human and the Divine Methods. The Daughters of Jerusalem. The Grace of Tears. The Green Tree and the Dry. Weep not for Me. Wherefore Should I Weep. A Look At the Three Crosses. The Cross a Revelation of Human Sinfulness. The Crucifixion of Christ. The Death of Jesus, and its Effects. The Passion of Our Lord.
Words from the Cross. A Prayer for Ignorant Sinners. Christ's Intercession on the Cross. Christ's Plea for Ignorant Sinners. Christ's Prayer for His Murderers. Christ's Prayer for Ignorant Sinners. Prayer for a Murderer. Sin Greater than it Seems. The First Cry from the Cross. The First Word of the Dying Jesus.
- On The Edge: Transitioning Imaginatively to College!
- Suite in E Minor.
- Spoon Lady;
- Bible study methods, help with Bible study, | LEC Lilbourne Evangelical Chapel?
The Prayer of Christ for His Murderers. The Unknown Depths of Sin. A Sad Spectacle and the Supreme Vision. Happiness in Saving Others. God requires a life lived in perpetual righteousness; a life lived in perfect obedience to His law before eternal life is bestowed. The biblical teaching that God requires a perfect, personal and perpetual obedience to His law before eternal life is attained is taught by the covenant of works made with Adam.
After God created Adam, he told him not to eat of the tree of knowledge of good and evil Gen 2: If Adam obeyed he would live. That is, he would gain access to the tree of life. Adam, however, failed, his own act of disobedience caused him to be ejected from Eden to prevent access to the tree of life. Our problem is not just that we have the guilt of sin but also that we lack a perfect righteousness Rom 2: Peter says that Jesus committed no sin 1 Peter 2: Christ is the way, the truth, and the life to heaven: Good works will not save us.
When the New Testament epistles explain the death of Christ, they do so in terms of necessity. The author of Hebrews speaking under divine inspiration not only says that the blood is necessary but only one type of blood will do—the blood of Christ. If God could simply by divine fiat pardon sin then the central message of Hebrews 9 and 10 would be totally untrue.
Furthermore, the Bible says that Christ appeased the wrath of God Rom 3: Paul did not for a moment entertain such thinking: Christ made peace through His blood of the cross Col 1: The issue of the necessity of the atonement is a life and death, heaven and hell matter. Are you going to trust in Christ alone for your salvation or will you continue on the path of iniquity and destruction?
These shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord and the glory of His power. Literacy, both here in America and around the world, is a very important subject. The ability to read well is essential to learning. The ability to write is critical to communication. Reading is a skill that improves with practice. The best way to practice reading is to spend quality time actually reading books. Parents of school-age children and young people need to encourage reading at home. Reading for pleasure is something all children and students should experience.
Even before children are old enough to attend school, parents can help the future personal and academic success of children by spending regular quality time reading to them. Reading non-fiction informational books is especially important. Make use of the public library if you have access to such a marvelous place. Choose books that are of interest to your child or student. Read more than one book on the subject. Read the easiest book or books you can find first. Then read a book written for young adult readers on the same non-fiction subject. Finally, read a book written for adults.
Your child will be able to understand the more complex adult-level book if your child has encountered the easier books first.
Chronology of Jesus
Paul urged Timothy to take special care to continue that practice. That would greatly help us to grow spiritually and increase in our knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ. For any who may read here, I would mention that I have created a reading program that is available on Amazon.
The book is pages long, with a page size of 8 by 10 inches. The title is The Language Enrichment Program. This resource works to improve reading comprehension, reading speed, and academic motivation. It works well for users of any age above age 8, and works for speakers of English as a second language too. I have used it with adults. I have used it with gifted and talented high school seniors. I have used it with reluctant learners. I have found it helps everyone I have used it with over a period of more than 50 years. The Language Enrichment Program is self-instructional and can be used without the help of a teacher or tutor.
Parents of motivated children under age 8 can use this resource if they help the child when the child has a question. The book contains a complete answer key with explanations where I have found explanations to be helpful or needed. I wish I could capture the essence of his message here in writing, but I am not that talented. Nevertheless, I would like to point out just a few things about Daniel 9: Daniel is making a great prayer to God on behalf of his nation and himself in chapter nine of the book of Daniel.
The whole prayer is most instructive. Daniel understands that the great troubles that have befallen his nation are a fulfillment of the promises blessings and curses given in the law of Moses see Deuteronomy Notice that Daniel expresses no doubt concerning the fact that Moses wrote the laws of God as found in our Bible.
Daniel accepts the Bible account as true, and so should we. In his prayer, Daniel confesses that a proper response to all the evil that has come upon his nation has not been made. The right response would be to come to God in earnest prayer. Daniel understood that proper prayer would lead to a change of heart and a turning to God. Much more can be studied regarding what Daniel 9: As it is written.
Thus every succeeding part of the Sacred Writings attests and proves the Divine authority of the preceding. The history relates the fulfillment of former predictions ; and then new prophecies are added, which future events accomplish, and thus demonstrate their inspiration to the latest ages. See on Dan 9: Below are the details of what Daddy said:. It is not to be found anywhere at all, but I have done my own research. There are two places in the whole Bible where references were made to painting of face, only two places, and the two places are bad.
One of the places talked about Jezebel. How many of you will name your daughter Jezebel? The second place is in Jeremiah 4: Those are the only two places I found, and they are terrible references. Now as far as am concerned, it is up to you to decide how you want to look, you want to make up, you want to paint yourself, you are at liberty. Have you seen anybody adding sugar to honey? Anytime you see a piece of furniture that is painted, wooden furniture that is painted, the wood is inferior.
When the wood is ebony, nobody paints it, no no no. I think children of God should realise they are precious enough, by the special grace of God and by the shed blood of Jesus Christ. Some people go about in the name of fashion wearing wigs. But this hair that you are wearing, from whose head was it cut? Do you know who was the original owner of the hair? Do you know what kind of anointing is in that hair? It is put in the most important part of your body, the head!!!
I always asked them, which one do you want me to anoint, the wig or the head? I told you, you will not smile by the time I finished. I have not been legalistic, I have not said thou shall not wear wig. I read something in the book of Revelation 7: What we wear matters. Why do you think the army wear uniforms? It is so that they will not accidentally shoot their own members. Can God recognize you at a glance, that is, as a child of God? Some people say it does not matter, and that what is inside is what is important, I agree with the last part, but what is inside will show outside.
When I became General Overseer, I brought a group of teachers to come and teach in the Bible College and they began to teach series of things I did not bargain for. They were teaching that God is not interested in the outside, He is interested in the inside, this man the G. So I went to Oyingbo market to buy two oranges, one ripe and the other green all over.
My Bible students were beginning to turn to rebels and God gave me wisdom, so I stood before the class and I said, which of this oranges will you take if I ask you to pick one? They all pointed at the yellow and ripe one, and I said why? They said because that one is going to be the sweeter one. How do you know when you have not seen the inside?
They all said what is inside the orange portrays and shows what is reflecting outside. An orange is sweet from the appearance because its inside is sweet and vice versa to unripe oranges…. It was at this point I passed the real message to his people and the Holy Spirit gave them change of heart afterwards. Why are you adding to what God has created? May you not be an enemy of God. Have you considered Jezebel in the Bible?
She was a perfect example of the usage of all these things, and she made all these things of demonic value. May you not be among her descendants in Jesus mighty name. Very shameful and pathetic! My wife and I have been studying the subject of holiness in the Bible, and particularly Hebrews She has brought up the subject of Christians who dye their hair a completely different color than what God created them with.
After noting how the orthodox statement of Chalcedon beautifully and succinctly defends the doctrine of two natures in one person, we need to examine and analyze some of the Chalcedonian propositions more closely. This examination will involve review. Everything that can be predicated of God is true of Christ.
He is truly God and truly man. He is consubstantial with the Father according to the Godhead. God is three persons Muslims reject this who are one in being. God the Son who was and is one with the Father and the Holy Spirit became man. The second person of the Trinity assumed a human nature. When Chalcedon speaks of Christ assuming human nature consubstantial according to manhood, it refers to [ generic ] unity with man. Jesus has all the attributes of humanity: In Christ, two distinct natures or substance are united in such a manner that the distinct properties of both natures are preserved.
The attributes of God are not somehow passed to man and the human properties are not transmitted to God. There is no mixing, intermingling or confounding of the two natures to form a new third substance. Not only is intermingling or mixing of the two natures impossible the finite cannot be made infinite , even if possible it would destroy the incarnation. Such a mixed being would be neither God or man. In Him, therefore, as the church has ever maintained, there were and are two wills, two energeia or operations. When the second person of the Trinity was incarnated He was hypostatically united to a genuine human nature.
The mediator did not unite Himself to a human person with a separate personality but with a human nature and thus the personality of Christ and the personality of the Logos are one and the same. The unipersonality of the Mediator is by far most difficult aspect of the incarnation to understand.
The doctrine of two natures in one person is to a certain degree beyond human comprehension. Note the following argument from the Scriptures. If our Lord was two distinct persons and not one there ought to be some Scripture evidence to prove it. However, there is none. On the contrary, Jesus always speaks, prays and acts as one person. With the doctrine of the Trinity there are three persons and one God.
Thus, there are abundant examples of the Father speaking to the Son Mk 1: Yet, we never encounter the human person Jesus praying, speaking or worshipping, or communing with the Son. There is no I—You consciousness or relationship within the Mediator. The Mediator is always represented as one person. He is called or addressed as prophet Acts 3: These titles and functions are predicated of the God-man and apply to the whole person. Does this mean that the divine and human natures are mixed or confused in any way?
This union in one person explains why the human nature of Jesus receives special treatment by the holy angels and men. The God-man Jesus Christ is the object of worship Matt 2: Although the ground of worship and prayer toward the messiah lies in His deity, nevertheless the union in one person of two natures makes the religious worship of the divine-human person lawful, appropriate and commendable. At other times He will make statements that can only be applied to His human nature e. If our Lord were two separate persons the writers of Scripture could not freely and simultaneously ascribe to Christ attribute of humanity and divinity.
One encounters Jesus the person controlling the weather Mk 4: The incarnate Son of God is the only source of life for the elect. Only people who believe in Him as fully God and fully man who as one person secured a perfect redemption can obtain eternal life. It is because of the union of two natures in one person that the infinite merit and efficacy of His work are due.
The heretical idea that Christ is both two persons and one person at the same time not only contradicts Scripture but also defies simple logic. Jesus cannot be two persons and one person at the same time. Such a view is essentially adoptionist in nature. As such, He has authority to bring us new revelation, revelation recorded for us in the New Testament. The New Testament shows by direct example as well as by omission that for genuine believers in Jesus Christ, observance of the Seventh-Day Sabbath is no longer required.
Christians may worship God on any day of the week they so choose, including every day! Practice as recorded in the New Testament shows conclusively that the Apostles met for specifically Christian worship on the First Day of the week, and that practice has continued until this day.
There has been a continuing but now completed discussion regarding the Seventh Day Sabbath issue. I wrote several responses during the discussion thread. I thought it would be good to share what I wrote here for future ease of reference. Now that I have transcribed that discussion here below, I am amazed at how long this post is. Despite the length, including considerable repetition for good measure, this ought to teach anyone who will take the time to read it just what the Bible says about this issue.
Our rest in Christ is speaking in a spiritual sense because through Christ we attain the Holy Spirit and it is the spirit that changes our heart so it is not us that does good but the spirit within us. And you are aware the sabbath was set apart sanctified at creation and kept prior to the law.
Paul attended the Synagogue for a time as a witness to the Jew first, in obedience to the command of Christ in Acts 1: Paul does allow for Seventh Day Sabbath keeping and worship for those Jews who had recently become Christians as a matter of their conscience Romans Paul sternly condemns the practice of Seventh-day Sabbath observance for those of the Gentile churches Paul founded Galatians 4: God is the One who rested in Genesis 2: The Sabbath is never once mentioned by name in the book of Genesis.
There is no observance of a weekly day of rest anywhere in the Genesis record. Rali Mosley , if you are in error then what Paul has to say may seem like a lie. But Paul always tells the truth. Nor can they prove the things of which they now accuse me. But this I confess to you, that according to the Way which they call a sect, so I worship the God of my fathers, believing all things which are written in the Law and in the Prophets. The assembly must cert ainly meet, for they will hear that you have come.
Therefore do what we tell you: We have four men who have taken a vow. Take them and be purified with them, and pay their expenses so that they may shave their heads, and that all may know that those things of which they were informed concerning you are nothing, but that you yourself also walk orderly and keep the law. He walked orderly and kept the law which included honoring the sabbath. Of course, Paul was not a liar. Paul did reach out to his fellow Israelites in his attempt to win them to Christ.
But that has nothing to do with the issue of Christians being obligated today to keep the Seventh Day Sabbath as a matter of law-keeping. There he commanded that Gentile Christians must not involve themselves in observing Jewish days and seasons, the expression includes the Seventh Day sabbath observance.
The commandment to keep the Sabbath was given exclusively to the Jewish nation and those living within its borders. The Fourth Commandment was never given as a commandment to Christians. There are no instances of the Fourth Commandment being stated in the imperative mood in the Greek text of the New Testament as a commandment addressed to Christians. Paul warned against any attempt to impose the observance of the Fourth Commandment Sabbath Law given exclusively to the Jews upon Christians.
Those who today attempt to make the Sabbath Observance a central issue as though it is an obligation to be placed upon other Christians are not walking according to the Gospel of Christ and often have missed the whole message of the transforming power of the Gospel through the power of the indwelling Holy Spirit, which is the emphasis of the New Testament. I am made all things to all men, that I might by all means save some. Rali Mosley , thank you for reading my comments. You must read and understand the Bible in terms of what it says, not what you or I may want it to say.
We must believe and teach according to the balance of truth presented in the New Testament and the Bi ble as a whole. Paul was a Jew, and in order not to offend the Jews, he did some things that we as Christians today have absolutely no obligation to do. Paul never commanded his Gentile converts to make vows and go to the Jewish Temple and follow the prescribed rites in the manner that he himself did. Every false doctrine and every false cult or religion or belief will fail the test of matching the balance of emphasis upon the doctrine or teaching involved as given in the Bible itself.
Your emphasis upon the Seventh Day Sabbath observance and the Fourth Commandment does not agree with the balance and emphasis of New Testament teaching. I have stated that the Fourth Commandment regarding Seventh Day Sabbath observance is never repeated in the New Testament as a commandment. Now, in the logical form which I have expressed my argument, my argument is very easy to refute. All you have to do is produce just ONE example of the Fourth Commandment stated as a command in the imperative mood in the New Testament.
My comment that the Sabbath issue does not represent the emphasis given in the New Testament is based upon the fact that such an emphasis is simply not there in the text. If this were a matter of concern, surely the new Gentile Christians would have been in need of instruction in this matter and evidence of this instruction would be reflected in the New Testament. Gentile Christians surely would have been cautioned against Sabbath-breaking.
But no such instruction is found in the New Testament.
What Paul specifically did in those special and individual particular historical circumstances does not form a rule of conduct we are to replicate today. Paul instructed us to be followers of him as he was a follower of Christ. Christ brought new revelation through the Apostle Paul which has been preserved in the letters of Paul found in our New Testament. That is what we should be emphasizing today. Produce your evidence that refutes the two claims I have made: Now produce your evidence from the New Testament record that refutes either or both of my assertions.
But be very careful to produce evidence that fulfills the requirements. Nothing you have presented refutes my claim about Paul whatsoever. It is your misreading of my claim, not my claim itself, that is in error.
Real Bible Study | Live Discussions of Biblical Issues and Topics
The sabbath was made holy at creation it was kept prior to the law being given and was kept by Christ and all the apostles. If you follow Christ you will walk as he walked and we know he kept the sabbath. We actually see Mary wait until the sabbath was over before visiting Christ tomb. This is what happens when you ask questions that causes one to think for themselves and not copy and paste what they learned at Bible study.
Kindly go back and actually READ with understanding what I wrote and provide the evidence I requested to refute my two assertions. But if saying I lost the debate is pleasing to your flesh then fine I lost lol. It took 6 hours to come up with that excuse?? You know very well that what you have said here in response to my challenge and correction of your expressed point of view regarding the Seventh Day Sabbath has not addressed the challenge I presented you.
So, whether you want to call this a dialogue or a debate, I raised two or more crucial issues that refute your position regarding what the New Testament and the Bible as a whole teach about the Seventh Day Sabbath question. As for six hours, I do not spend much time using this computer. I have my own studies to pursue. But the time delay provides you some time to prepare a good answer to my two challenges, neither of which you have addressed yet:. If the issue is as important as you seem to suppose, your view of this matter of keeping the Seventh Day Sabbath Holy ought to have some degree of emphasis in the New Testament.
So far, you have not shown that this is the case. What Paul did in that incident has nothing to do with keeping the Seventh Day Sabbath. Paul did what he did to avoid unnecessarily provoking conflict with Jews who mistakenly thought that Paul taught Jewish converts not to keep the law of Moses. You must first show where the change was made in the commandment we see the sabbath being observed all throughout the New Testament Jews and gentiles alike observing the sabbath.
Again the burden of proof would be on you sir. To address your questions even though the burden of proof is on you. The fact is we see Jews and gentiles alike honoring the sabbath in the New Testament. But it simply means followers of Christ. So again did Christ honor the sabbath? If so are you walking as he did? Also the first day of the week was never thought to be the new sabbath it was simply a day they gathered together to discuss finances, etc.
Thank you for your good replies and additional challenges to my position. It remains as it was originally instituted for the Jews in Israel. It remains still i n force for the Jews today, so it has not been changed. During His earthly life he kept the commandments perfectly. Paul received new revelation directly from our Lord Jesus Christ, and that new revelation is reflected in the doctrines taught in the Pauline Epistles. We, therefore, must study and obey the new revelation given by our Lord Jesus Christ through Paul as preserved in the Pauline Epistles and the Book of Acts.
There are many specifics given in the Old Testament Scriptures that detail how the Jews were instructed to keep the weekly Sabbath. It is highly unlikely that there are any Christians today who actually fulfill the stipulated requirements that accompany the command to keep the Sabbath holy as given to the Jews in the Hebrew Scriptures. You are correct that the First Day of the Week was never regarded as the new Sabbath. Gentile Christians were never taught to observe the Jewish Sabbath. In fact, Paul quite sternly commands his converts not to do so in Galatians 4: The nature of those worship services can be discerned from the record of their observance recorded in the Pauline Epistles.
As for walking as Christ did, just because Jesus observed the Seventh Day Sabbath as an obedient Jew does not at all mean that Christians today who are not Jews must do the same. I have established by your lack of specific response to my two challenges that, at least so far, you have found it impossible to answer them. Of the Ten Commandments, nine commandments are repeated in the New Testament for our admonition and instruction.
Search Site with Google
One commandment is never repeated in any listing of the ten commandments in the NT, neither by Christ nor any of the NT writers. The reason is plain to read: Those who truly believe in our Lord Jesus Christ have become new creations in Him. True faith results in regeneration Titus 3: This is the focus of our new life in Christ, not law-keeping Galatians 2: We are now free from the law of sin and death Romans 8: You stat ed Paul told converts not to keep sabbath in ga 4: This is why audience relevancy is very important.
We must first understand who Paul was writing to. But now after you have known God, or rather are known by God, Gal 4: Romans 7 in its totality explains this. The law of sin no longer has dominion over us because we have attained the spirit and now we are given the grace to repent. Hebrews 10 tells us if we sin willfully there is no more sacrifice. Gal 5 tells us the lawless will not inherit the kingdom, as does Rev Thank you again for a kind and interesting reply.
I believe the balance of Bible evidence demonstrates that you have not correctly understood Galatians 4: Leviticus 23, Numbers 28, 29, Luk The three annual feasts of the Jews. Sabbatic years, and years of jubilee. While it is improbable that the Galatian churches had actually been observing a year of jubilee, yet if they observed the least of the ceremonial days, they acknowledged the principle, and it was as though they had observed them all.
The Apostle had heretofore mentioned only circumcision as indicative of the declension of the Galatian believers. But of course they could not draw the line at that; once they put themselves under the law, they became debtors to do all the law enjoined Gal 5: Paul received his doctrine directly by revelation from our Lord Jesus Christ Gal 1: The gospel Paul preached and taught did not include the necessity of Sabbath observance.
Falling from grace Gal 5: Paul nowhere in Galatians suggests that the Galatians had gone this far Gal 3: While Paul grants some degree of liberty in the matter of choice of day of worship see Rom It is very striking that the Fourth Commandment is never once given as a command in the New Testament, though the other nine are repeated as commands for Christians [ 1 Exo Christians never met for specifically Christian worship on the Sabbath in order to keep the Sabbath. In obedience to the command of Christ Act 1: They regularly met upon the first day of the week Acts The Sabbath was never changed to Sunday.
Jews still worship on the Sabbath, but properly taught Christians worship Christ on the First Day of the week, and have done so since the beginning of the New Testament Church. See related note at Isa Festivals in ancient Rome were a very important part of Roman religious life during both the Republican and Imperial eras, and one of the primary features of the Roman calendar. State holidays were celebrated by the Roman people and received public funding. Games ludi , such as the Ludi Apollinares, were not technically feriae, but the days on which they were celebrated were dies festi, holidays in the modern sense of days off work.
Although feriae were paid for by the state, ludi were often funded by wealthy individuals. Feriae privatae were holidays celebrated in honor of private individuals or by families. Stativae were annual holidays that held a fixed or stable date on the calendar.